<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I always use Auto-Bracketing</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml</link>
	<description>Photography tips and tutorials from Photographer David Kennard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kennard</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kennard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-167315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167309&quot;&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Rick

It depends on your camera model, but with some models once you have set the camera to exposure bracket, it will always bracket all your shots until you turn bracketing off. I don&#039;t have a D5100, but with my D200 if you have your camera set to single shot drive mode and bracketing turned on, then it will behave as you describe.

So, all you need to do is to turn bracketing on when you want it, and then remember to turn bracketing off when you don&#039;t want it. I&#039;m not quite sure how exactly you turn bracketing on / off with the D5100, but the manual should tell you if you&#039;re not sure.

Hope that fixes it

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167309">Rick</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Rick</p>
<p>It depends on your camera model, but with some models once you have set the camera to exposure bracket, it will always bracket all your shots until you turn bracketing off. I don&#8217;t have a D5100, but with my D200 if you have your camera set to single shot drive mode and bracketing turned on, then it will behave as you describe.</p>
<p>So, all you need to do is to turn bracketing on when you want it, and then remember to turn bracketing off when you don&#8217;t want it. I&#8217;m not quite sure how exactly you turn bracketing on / off with the D5100, but the manual should tell you if you&#8217;re not sure.</p>
<p>Hope that fixes it</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-167309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I am having trouble with my nikon d5100. It is bracketing automatically, even when I don&#039;t hold down the shutter. For every three pictures, even if they are of diffferent things, it still is bracketing them. The first one will be underexposed, second normal, and third, overexposed. I do not want to be auto bracketing every time I shoot, and Im having trouble making it so that sometimes its on, sometimes its off. Any suggestions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am having trouble with my nikon d5100. It is bracketing automatically, even when I don&#8217;t hold down the shutter. For every three pictures, even if they are of diffferent things, it still is bracketing them. The first one will be underexposed, second normal, and third, overexposed. I do not want to be auto bracketing every time I shoot, and Im having trouble making it so that sometimes its on, sometimes its off. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kennard</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kennard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-167241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167212&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi David

Do you mean the camera can&#039;t autofocus, or are pictures are coming out blurry, or are the pictures too dark? It&#039;s difficult to give much advice without more specific information on what you mean by being unable to shoot.

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167212">David</a>.</p>
<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Do you mean the camera can&#8217;t autofocus, or are pictures are coming out blurry, or are the pictures too dark? It&#8217;s difficult to give much advice without more specific information on what you mean by being unable to shoot.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-167212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-167212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir I am using a Canon 450D camera and I am unable to shoot in the dark in all the settings,pleasr help.
Thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir I am using a Canon 450D camera and I am unable to shoot in the dark in all the settings,pleasr help.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kennard</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-91666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kennard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-91666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-89681&quot;&gt;dr.kshitij&lt;/a&gt;.

It is not a strict necessity to shoot bracketed images on a tripod, but if you shoot handheld, then you need some software that will align the handheld images correctly. I use Photoshop&#039;s auto align feature, I believe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hdrsoft.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photomatix&lt;/a&gt; can also align handheld images automatically.

Software can&#039;t always align the images correctly, which is why it is generally better to use a tripod if possible. Personally, the majority of my bracketed and then blended photos are shot handheld with no tripod.

I am 90% sure the software that comes with the camera is pretty useless for anything other than doing a basic RAW conversion. If you want to blend bracketed shots, particularly handheld ones, then you&#039;ll have to fork out for some more expensive software. Possibly the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gimp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GIMP&lt;/a&gt; (free) would be okay, but I don&#039;t have any experience with that program. Aligning the handheld images may also be able to be done using panorama software like &lt;a href=&quot;http://hugin.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hugin&lt;/a&gt; (free).

The other thing to note is that the D5100 is known for having a good dynamic range (and likely the D3200 will be as good or maybe better). So there is less need to bracket shots - you can take a single shot exposed for the highlights, then pull up the brightness of the shadows to reveal more shadow detail.

Personally I would rather have the D5100 than the D3200, both for the bracketing, and also the articulated screen. I&#039;m sure both are good competent cameras though.

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-89681">dr.kshitij</a>.</p>
<p>It is not a strict necessity to shoot bracketed images on a tripod, but if you shoot handheld, then you need some software that will align the handheld images correctly. I use Photoshop&#8217;s auto align feature, I believe <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" rel="nofollow">Photomatix</a> can also align handheld images automatically.</p>
<p>Software can&#8217;t always align the images correctly, which is why it is generally better to use a tripod if possible. Personally, the majority of my bracketed and then blended photos are shot handheld with no tripod.</p>
<p>I am 90% sure the software that comes with the camera is pretty useless for anything other than doing a basic RAW conversion. If you want to blend bracketed shots, particularly handheld ones, then you&#8217;ll have to fork out for some more expensive software. Possibly the <a href="http://www.gimp.org/" rel="nofollow">GIMP</a> (free) would be okay, but I don&#8217;t have any experience with that program. Aligning the handheld images may also be able to be done using panorama software like <a href="http://hugin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">Hugin</a> (free).</p>
<p>The other thing to note is that the D5100 is known for having a good dynamic range (and likely the D3200 will be as good or maybe better). So there is less need to bracket shots &#8211; you can take a single shot exposed for the highlights, then pull up the brightness of the shadows to reveal more shadow detail.</p>
<p>Personally I would rather have the D5100 than the D3200, both for the bracketing, and also the articulated screen. I&#8217;m sure both are good competent cameras though.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr.kshitij</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-89681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dr.kshitij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-89681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have been using point and shoot and now i am ready to upgrade.
i have a number of questions.
a. shud i go for dslr or try mirrorless. my photography expert friend said ......dslr
b. i was disappointed to read that video shooting is not that good in dslr coz video continuous auto focus is a problem....and audio might catch the lens focusing noise.
c. now amongst dslr, i have to decide between d3200 and d5100. both cost same. difference is d3200 is 20% lighter in weight, has expeed 3, 24 mpixels, wifi, guide mode and so on, while d5100 is time tested, it has auto bracketing, screen tilts and adjusts and so on. which one to go for.
what am i looking for?
well....i was looking for a device to shoot both video and pics.....but after reading that videos wont be that great.....nw i am looking for nice pics.....i have a research mind....and i tend to like the idea of bracketing. this gives me more chances of getting the perfect shot coz i wud be getting 3 shots. now right here i wish to clarify.....is it dire necessity to have a tripod to shoot those 3 pics....i am told ....all 3 shud be taken without shaking camera....i wont use tripod......but i can try to keep hand stable. like i said...i did like the idea of having one over and under exposed shot. now the software that comes with the nikon....will it be enough to do the editing for final pic on laptop or will i have to purchase another software.
what i like in d3200 is light weight, guide mode and so on.....but i dont know.....if d5100 is technologically more advanced. 
last thought.....d3200 is recently launched while d5100 is old and therefore d5200 is expected. but i guess it will be significantly more than d5200......may be it will be too costly for me. so lets stick to 700usd mark and decide between d3200 and d5100. 
kindly guide.
thx
k]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been using point and shoot and now i am ready to upgrade.<br />
i have a number of questions.<br />
a. shud i go for dslr or try mirrorless. my photography expert friend said &#8230;&#8230;dslr<br />
b. i was disappointed to read that video shooting is not that good in dslr coz video continuous auto focus is a problem&#8230;.and audio might catch the lens focusing noise.<br />
c. now amongst dslr, i have to decide between d3200 and d5100. both cost same. difference is d3200 is 20% lighter in weight, has expeed 3, 24 mpixels, wifi, guide mode and so on, while d5100 is time tested, it has auto bracketing, screen tilts and adjusts and so on. which one to go for.<br />
what am i looking for?<br />
well&#8230;.i was looking for a device to shoot both video and pics&#8230;..but after reading that videos wont be that great&#8230;..nw i am looking for nice pics&#8230;..i have a research mind&#8230;.and i tend to like the idea of bracketing. this gives me more chances of getting the perfect shot coz i wud be getting 3 shots. now right here i wish to clarify&#8230;..is it dire necessity to have a tripod to shoot those 3 pics&#8230;.i am told &#8230;.all 3 shud be taken without shaking camera&#8230;.i wont use tripod&#8230;&#8230;but i can try to keep hand stable. like i said&#8230;i did like the idea of having one over and under exposed shot. now the software that comes with the nikon&#8230;.will it be enough to do the editing for final pic on laptop or will i have to purchase another software.<br />
what i like in d3200 is light weight, guide mode and so on&#8230;..but i dont know&#8230;..if d5100 is technologically more advanced.<br />
last thought&#8230;..d3200 is recently launched while d5100 is old and therefore d5200 is expected. but i guess it will be significantly more than d5200&#8230;&#8230;may be it will be too costly for me. so lets stick to 700usd mark and decide between d3200 and d5100.<br />
kindly guide.<br />
thx<br />
k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mollo</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-32400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Mollo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-32400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-30065&quot;&gt;Dave Kennard&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you. I will try that software.  My HDR Software will not blend exposures without applying the HDR effect.  Its cool sometimes but most times I like a more natural effect.  Just got a new Canon 17-55mm 2.8 and can&#039;t wait to start experimenting.

  Thanks again !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-30065">Dave Kennard</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you. I will try that software.  My HDR Software will not blend exposures without applying the HDR effect.  Its cool sometimes but most times I like a more natural effect.  Just got a new Canon 17-55mm 2.8 and can&#8217;t wait to start experimenting.</p>
<p>  Thanks again !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kennard</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-30065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kennard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-30065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-29862&quot;&gt;Thomas Mollo&lt;/a&gt;.

Personally I manually blend my bracketed images together using layer masks in Photoshop and use Photoshop&#039;s auto align feature for aligning bracketed shots taken handheld. You can see the process I go through with an image at: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/75-exposure-blending-to-increase-the-dynamic-range-of-an-image.xhtml&quot; &gt;Exposure blending to increase the dynamic range of an image&lt;/a&gt;.

Bracketed photos can also be blended without HDR automatically, this method is known as exposure fusion. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hdrsoft.com/&quot; &gt;Photomatix&lt;/a&gt; offers both HDR and Exposure fusion, while &lt;a href=&quot;http://software.bergmark.com/enfuseGUI/Main.html&quot; &gt;EnfuseGUI is a free exposure fusion software&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-29862">Thomas Mollo</a>.</p>
<p>Personally I manually blend my bracketed images together using layer masks in Photoshop and use Photoshop&#8217;s auto align feature for aligning bracketed shots taken handheld. You can see the process I go through with an image at: <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/75-exposure-blending-to-increase-the-dynamic-range-of-an-image.xhtml">Exposure blending to increase the dynamic range of an image</a>.</p>
<p>Bracketed photos can also be blended without HDR automatically, this method is known as exposure fusion. <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/">Photomatix</a> offers both HDR and Exposure fusion, while <a href="http://software.bergmark.com/enfuseGUI/Main.html">EnfuseGUI is a free exposure fusion software</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Mollo</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-29862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Mollo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-29862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the best software to use for auto bracketing. I have a Canon 60D and I&#039;ve been experimenting. I did a few auto brackets in my HDR Software but is there software that just merges the bracketed photos or does it have to be done in HDR ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the best software to use for auto bracketing. I have a Canon 60D and I&#8217;ve been experimenting. I did a few auto brackets in my HDR Software but is there software that just merges the bracketed photos or does it have to be done in HDR ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kennard</title>
		<link>https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kennard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/?p=5#comment-1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-1868&quot;&gt;Ronnie Miley&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Ronnie

I don&#039;t have a 5D Mk II, but my understanding is that you can bracket 3 images up to +/- 2.0 EV, and the bracket amount can be set in 0.3 or 0.5 EV increments. (So yes, it does have auto bracketing).

Hope that helps.

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.davidkennardphotography.com/blog/5-why-i-always-use-auto-bracketing.xhtml#comment-1868">Ronnie Miley</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Ronnie</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a 5D Mk II, but my understanding is that you can bracket 3 images up to +/- 2.0 EV, and the bracket amount can be set in 0.3 or 0.5 EV increments. (So yes, it does have auto bracketing).</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
